Problems relating to Trade and Investment on Australia
24. Indigested legislation, abrupt changes |
|||
Issue |
Issue details |
Requests |
Reference |
(1) Frequent Amendments of GOA Policy | - Frequent policy reviews devoid of consistency arising from political turmoil drives business operators into huge amount of funding and a long preparatory development period, which disrupts particularly the infrastructure business, etc. that demand huge investments and a long preparatory period. | - It is requested that GOA constructs its structure capable of maintaining consistent policy over mid-long terms. | |
(2) Inadequate Legislation on Corporate Merger | - Due to the absence of legislative scheme on merger, the only means available to a purchaser is to succeed from the predecessor, or renew the existing contracts and agreements, which necessitates a lot of extreme complications. | - It is requested that GOA takes step to complete merger legislation, equivalent to the corresponding Japanese legislation. | - The Corporation Act 2001 |
(3) Abrupt Changes in Taxation Scheme/Delayed Implementing Regulations | - From time to time, abrupt changes in the taxation scheme/royalty occur. Moreover, after the announcement of the outline for legislative change, it takes a long time before the release of the full legislation, in many cases, impacting upon business decisions. | - It is requested that GOA takes step to ensure: -- provision of opportunities to exchange dialogues with major enterprises including FFEs, and -- transparency in the process of refining the bill in detail. |
|
(4) Delayed Privatisation | - The delayed privatisation has resulted in immature competitive market. | - It is requested that GOA under its leadership introduces the fundamental principle of the market competition. | |
<<BACK |